AWS Cloud & DevOps Tutorial 0/70 lessons ~6 min read Lesson 69“IAM, VPC, EC2, Lambda, ECS, EKS, Terraform, CI/CD, and AWS operations”

AWS Cloud and DevOps System Design Interviews

Hiring loops for Cloud and DevOps roles ask you to design systems under ambiguity: scale, security, availability, cost, networking, and delivery. This lesson trains a **repeatable

Course progress0%

Focus

15 guided sections

Practice signal

Examples included

Career prep

Interview Q&A included

AWS Cloud and DevOps System Design Interviews

AWS Cloud & DevOps Engineering · Lesson 69 · Production Projects and Interview

Lesson Overview

Hiring loops for Cloud and DevOps roles ask you to design systems under ambiguity: scale, security, availability, cost, networking, and delivery. This lesson trains a repeatable interview method using TechLearningPro-flavored prompts, Mermaid-ready structures, trade-off narration, and scoring rubrics you can use for peer mocks. You will practice clarifying requirements, proposing an architecture, diving deep on one risk, estimating cost dimensions (illustrative), and stating how you would operate and evolve the system—without inventing AWS APIs or quoting fake certification outcomes.

Continuity: entire course, especially Well-Architected (11, 58), Modules 2–5 platforms, and Projects 64–68. Tag study notes Project=tlp-lesson69. Whiteboarding needs no cloud spend; optional lab diagrams still respect budgets.

Learning Objectives

Apply a timed clarification → design → deep dive → operate → wrap method.
Ask NFRs: RPS, data size, RTO/RPO, compliance, budget, team skills.
Sketch multi-AZ AWS architectures with identity and network boundaries.
Compare compute options (EC2, ECS, EKS, Lambda) with explicit criteria.
Address data stores (RDS, DynamoDB, S3) by access pattern.
Design CI/CD and promotion across accounts.
Include observability and incident hooks in the design.
Discuss cost drivers without inventing prices.
Handle curveballs (region failure, traffic 10×, zero-trust).
Use a scoring rubric for self/peer evaluation.
Avoid anti-patterns: buzzword bingo, silent assumptions, API invention.
Map prompts to TechLearningPro portfolio projects as evidence.
Practice three timed scenarios end-to-end.
Write ADRs for disputed interview decisions in mocks.
Communicate trade-offs aloud as first-class content.
Separate control plane vs data plane failure modes.
Discuss multi-account placement briefly.
Defend a “boring” design when it fits.
Timebox deep dives to interviewer interest.
Prepare artifact: one-pager method + three annotated diagrams.

Prerequisites

Comfort with core AWS services from Modules 1–5.
Portfolio projects 64–68 completed or sketched.
Peer or recording setup for timed practice.

Detailed Core Concepts

What interviewers evaluate

Not memorized service lists—problem structuring, correct service categories, trade-off honesty, security instinct, operational realism, and communication. Senior bars add multi-account, org constraints, and migration thinking.

The TechLearningPro method (45-minute shape)

Clarify (5–8 min): users, scale, consistency, latency, compliance, budget, existing skills.
Back-of-envelope (3 min): RPS, storage growth, fan-out. Label guesses.
High-level design (10 min): boxes and arrows; happy path.
Deep dives (15 min): data model, IAM, networking, CI/CD, DR—follow interviewer.
Operate & evolve (5 min): metrics, failure, cost, next iteration.
Summary (2 min): decisions and risks.

Scoring rubric (100 points)

Area	Points	Strong signal
Requirements & assumptions	15	Explicit NFRs; called-out unknowns
Architecture fit	25	Coherent AWS design; right abstraction
Security & identity	15	Least privilege, boundaries, encryption
Reliability & ops	15	Multi-AZ, backups, alarms, runbooks
Delivery & IaC	10	CI/CD, environments, rollback
Cost awareness	10	Drivers named; no fake quotes
Communication	10	Clear, trade-offs, time management

Pass guideline for mocks: ≥70 with no critical security miss. Critical miss examples: public admin DB, long-lived keys in git, single-AZ for stateful primary without acknowledgment.

Prompt bank (practice these)

P1 — Global course content delivery: static + dynamic API; CloudFront; origin; auth.
P2 — Enrollment API at 5k RPS peak: ECS vs Lambda; throttling; data store.
P3 — Order platform: event-driven; idempotency; DLQ.
P4 — Multi-account landing zone for 50 engineers.
P5 — CI/CD for containers with evidence of rollback.
P6 — Analytics lake with governed access (high level).
P7 — Hybrid connectivity for campus labs.
P8 — DR for DynamoDB orders with stated RPO.
P9 — Zero-downtime migration of a monolith module.
P10 — Cost crisis: bill 3×; find levers.

Service selection heuristics (speak these aloud)

Spiky, short tasks → Lambda; long-lived/heavy → containers/VMs.
Relational joins/transactions → RDS/Aurora; key-value at scale → DynamoDB.
Large immutable objects → S3.
Fan-out → EventBridge/SNS; buffer → SQS.
Many teams → multi-account.
Need k8s ecosystem → EKS; else prefer ECS/Fargate for AWS-centric apps.

What not to do

Invent API parameter names; claim “guaranteed 99.999%” without design; ignore cost; skip security until asked; draw 30 services for a blog.

Architecture and Design Diagrams

mermaid
flowchart TB
  Clarify[Clarify NFRs] --> Estimate[Back-of-envelope]
  Estimate --> HLD[High-level design]
  HLD --> Deep[Deep dive risk]
  Deep --> Ops[Ops and cost]
  Ops --> Wrap[Summary of decisions]

mermaid
flowchart LR
  Users --> Edge[Route53 / CloudFront / ALB]
  Edge --> Compute[ECS or Lambda]
  Compute --> Data[(RDS / DynamoDB / S3)]
  Compute --> Bus[EventBridge / SQS]
  subgraph Cross
    IAM[IAM / Identity Center]
    Obs[CloudWatch / Alarms]
    Cicd[CI/CD]
  end

mermaid
flowchart TB
  subgraph Rubric
    R[Requirements]
    A[Architecture]
    S[Security]
    Rel[Reliability]
    D[Delivery]
    C[Cost]
    Comm[Communication]
  end

Technical Explanation

Running prompt P2 (worked sketch)

Clarify: peak 5k RPS read-heavy enrollments list; writes 10%; latency p95 < 300 ms; PCI out of scope; team knows containers.
Design: CloudFront optional for GETs; ALB → ECS Fargate; DynamoDB for enrollment records; Redis/ElastiCache only if measured; Cognito or JWT at edge.
Deep dive: on-demand DynamoDB; idempotent writes; autoscaling; alarms on 5xx and latency.
Cost: Fargate hours, ALB LCU, DynamoDB RRUs—verify pricing pages.
Evolve: move reads to CQRS later if needed—do not start there.

Running prompt P4 (worked sketch)

OU map; Identity Center; baseline modules; SCPs; separate prod; CI OIDC; no workloads in management. Deep dive: state splitting; break-glass. Cost: Config/CloudTrail/GuardDuty. Risk: SCP blocking deploys—sandbox test.

Handling curveballs

Region down: state RPO/RTO; pilot light for orders; DNS failover caveats.
10× traffic: cache, queue writes, scale ECS; identify bottleneck first.
Stricter compliance: private subnets, CMK, CloudTrail, Config, maybe PrivateLink.

Using portfolio as proof

“In Project 3 I implemented DLQ redrive…” beats hypothetical only. Bring one diagram from each project mentally.

Peer mock protocol

Interviewer uses rubric silently first 40 minutes; last 5 minutes feedback with scores. Record yourself once weekly.

Practical Implementation or Design Walkthrough

Problem

Solve three timed system design scenarios with diagrams and rubric scores.

Steps

Pick P2, P3, P4 (or substitute).
45-minute timer each; notes only—no AWS console required.
Draw Mermaid or paper; speak trade-offs.
Self-score with rubric; note critical misses.
Rewrite one ADR for the hardest decision.
Teach-back method to a peer.
Optional: deploy nothing; if you lab a piece, budget+cleanup.
Archive diagrams under evidence/lesson69/.
Link to Projects 65–68 artifacts.
Schedule lesson 70 practical drills.

Enterprise Real-World Scenarios

Buzzword bingo

Candidate says mesh+lakehouse+Kubernetes for a CRUD API. Interviewer docks Architecture and Cost. Fix: boring ECS+RDS wins.

Silent single-AZ

Never mentioned AZ loss. Critical Reliability miss.

Fake pricing

“Lambda is always cheaper.” Without workload shape, false. Fix: name drivers and say “verify pricing.”

Security last

Public RDS. Automatic fail in many loops.

No delivery story

Beautiful boxes, no deploy/rollback. DevOps role miss.

Best Practices

Clarify before drawing.
State assumptions explicitly.
Prefer simple designs that meet NFRs.
Lead with data plane and identity.
Mention multi-AZ by default.
Tie monitoring to SLIs.
Discuss rollback.
Name cost drivers.
Invite interviewer priorities.
Use portfolio evidence.
Timebox.
Summarize decisions.
Admit unknowns; propose validation.
Avoid inventing APIs.
Practice aloud weekly.

Common Mistakes and Anti-Patterns

Jumping to services before NFRs.
Over-architecture.
Ignoring IAM.
Single points of failure unacknowledged.
No cost discussion.
Invented APIs/flags.
Treating AWS SLA as your SLO.
Mute trade-offs.
Drawing without data model.
Arguing instead of clarifying.

Troubleshooting and Design Review

Symptom	Cause	Action
Running out of time	Too deep too early	Re-ask interviewer priority
Interviewer confused	Jumped levels	Return to HLD
Security grilling	Missed IAM	Restart identity boundary
Low architecture score	Wrong store	Revisit access patterns
Low ops score	No alarms/DR	Add operate section
Nervous silence	No method	Use method checklist

Interview Questions and Answers

Q1: How do you start? A: Clarify NFRs and constraints; restate problem.
Q2: ECS vs EKS? A: Ops needs and k8s ecosystem vs simplicity.
Q3: DynamoDB vs RDS? A: Access patterns and transactions.
Q4: How include CI/CD? A: Build→scan→deploy→rollback across accounts.
Q5: Multi-account why? A: Blast radius and governance.
Q6: Cost without numbers? A: Name meters; avoid fake quotes.
Q7: Region failure? A: Pattern by RTO/RPO; DNS and data replication honesty.
Q8: Security baseline? A: Private data plane, least privilege, encryption, logging.
Q9: What is a critical miss? A: Exposed data stores, no auth, invented nonsense.
Q10: How use portfolio? A: Cite project evidence for decisions.
Q11: SLO in design? A: Define user journey success metric.
Q12: Event-driven when? A: Async side effects and fan-out.
Q13: Landing zone in app design? A: Place workload account; identity path.
Q14: How to practice? A: Timed mocks + rubric.
Q15: Wrap-up content? A: Decisions, risks, next measurements.

Deep dive: One-minute architecture spine (memorize)

Edge → identity → compute → data → async → observability → delivery → cost. If you can place each noun on the board for any prompt, you rarely freeze. Expand only the nouns the interviewer cares about. TechLearningPro candidates who recite this spine recover even after a bad first drawing.

Deep dive: Interviewer nudge phrases

When stuck, ask: “Should I go deeper on data modeling, networking, or delivery?” When corrected, restate the new constraint and adjust the diagram visibly. When time is low, say: “I’ll summarize decisions and open risks.” These phrases demonstrate senior communication without adding fake technical claims.

Hands-On Exercises

Exercise: Three timed system design scenarios with diagrams

Deliverable: Scored mocks, diagrams, ADR, and a reusable method one-pager.

Challenge ADR

Under a 30-minute interview constraint, drop analytics deep dive and prioritize security+rollback; ADR the timebox strategy for mocks.

Lab evidence checklist

three timed scenario writeups, diagrams, rubric scores, one ADR, method checklist; budget/cleanup confirmation.

Narrative: A candidate lost an otherwise strong loop by inventing a console-only API; rubric Communication and Architecture crashed—method plus docs discipline would have saved it

A candidate lost an otherwise strong loop by inventing a console-only API; rubric Communication and Architecture crashed—method plus docs discipline would have saved it.

Continuity

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Deep dive: ADR template (TechLearningPro)

text
# ADR-NNNN: Title
Date:
Status: Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-XXXX
Context:
Decision:
Consequences:
Evidence / links:

Deep dive: Portfolio README skeleton

text
TechLearningPro Project — Lesson 69
- Problem / NFRs
- Architecture (diagram + service rationale)
- Repo layout
- Deploy / destroy
- Security checklist
- Observability
- Failure tests
- Cost notes (illustrative; verify pricing)
- ADRs

Deep dive: Budget and tagging

Create or verify a budget with email/SNS subscriber before any apply. Tag Project=tlp-lesson69, Owner=<you>, Environment=lab. Screenshot Cost Explorer filtered by tag after destroy to prove idle cost returned near zero (allow for delayed billing).

Extended enterprise scenario: acquisition pressure

Leadership wants the lab promoted as “production-ready marketing copy.” Refuse without PRR evidence from lesson 63, WAR risks from lesson 58, and failure-test artifacts from this lesson.

Extended enterprise scenario: disputed decision

Two senior engineers disagree on the primary architecture choice. Run a timeboxed RFC, record ADR with revisit date, and keep the rejected alternative documented so interviews and audits see the trade-off—not silence.

Extended practice scenario 1 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Confirm AWS Budgets alerts exist for the sandbox; tag every resource Project=tlp-lesson69. Do not proceed without a budget subscriber.

In a timed drill for AWS Cloud and DevOps system design interviews at TechLearningPro, implement or design the core lab with a partner observing. The observer's job is to stop any step that invents API flags, hardcodes secrets, invents pricing numbers presented as current quotes, or skips budget and cleanup. After the drill, rewrite your ADR in ten lines: context, decision, consequences. Attach evidence: three timed scenario writeups, diagrams, rubric scores, one ADR, method checklist, and destroy confirmation for any lab resources.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Finally, teach back the lesson overview paragraph from memory, then check against the text. Gaps become flashcards. Premium courses finish when you can operate under time pressure without treating AWS Cloud and DevOps system design interviews as a mystery.

Extended practice scenario 2 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Document the lesson's primary architecture decision in a ten-line ADR: context, decision, status, consequences.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 3 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Map identity paths: who can create/modify the resources in this lesson; which IAM roles are least privilege.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 4 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Design observability: CloudWatch metrics/alarms or equivalent signals that prove the control works.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 5 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Run or design a negative test: denied access, misconfiguration, or failed dependency—capture evidence.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 6 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Estimate cost dimensions for this lesson's activities. Label figures illustrative; verify pricing pages with dates.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 7 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Produce a cleanup checklist and execute destroy for any billable lab resources created for lesson 69.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 8 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Cross-link prior course lessons that this design depends on; list two failure modes inherited from those layers.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 9 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Security review: encryption at rest/in transit, public exposure checks, CloudTrail visibility for management events.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 10 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Reliability review: failure injection, rollback path, how detection and recovery work.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 11 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Performance review: throughput, latency, or scaling limits relevant to AWS Cloud and DevOps system design interviews at TechLearningPro.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 12 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Write a runbook section for on-call: symptoms, first three diagnostic steps, escalation, rollback.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 13 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Config/compliance angle: which controls must be true before production promotion.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 14 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Multi-account consideration: how this workload sits in landing-zone OU boundaries from lessons 48–49 and 67.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 15 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Interview drill: explain AWS Cloud and DevOps system design interviews at TechLearningPro to a hiring manager in three minutes without inventing APIs.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 16 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Pair review: partner stops any invented CLI flags, hardcoded secrets, or fake current prices.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 17 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

FinOps continuity from lesson 47: idle resources, data transfer, and when to decommission lab stacks.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 18 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

DR continuity from lesson 45 and 68: recoverability must survive the change you are shipping.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 19 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Produce evidence pack: diagrams, configs, test results, cleanup proof.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 20 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Challenge constraint: tighter monthly budget—what do you sequence differently?

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 21 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Challenge constraint: stricter compliance—what evidence gates promotion?

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 22 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Challenge constraint: shorter maintenance window—what pre-staging changes?

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 23 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Teach-back: recite the Lesson Overview paragraph, then check against the text; flashcard gaps.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 24 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Dress rehearsal: tabletop under a timer with observer notes.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Extended practice scenario 25 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Final synthesis note: one paragraph connecting AWS Cloud and DevOps system design interviews at TechLearningPro to TechLearningPro production ownership.

Uses Projects 64–68 as evidence; next lesson 70 adds troubleshooting scenarios, whiteboarding, STAR stories, and a study plan.

Compliance evidence pack for auditors / platform leads

Budget configs, tagging proof (Project=tlp-lesson69), architecture diagram, ADR, negative-test evidence, encryption settings notes, CloudTrail/Config references where applicable, pricing-page retrieval dates for any dollar claims, cleanup confirmation.

Glossary drill

Review every bold term introduced in Detailed Core Concepts and Interview Q&A. Write one sentence definitions from memory; correct against the lesson. Unfamiliar AWS console navigation becomes a lab note, not a guess. Focus terms: NFR clarification, rubric critical miss, back-of-envelope, trade-off narration.

Budget and cleanup sworn statement

I verified budgets remain enabled with alert subscribers. I deleted or scheduled deletion for orphan lab resources from lesson 69 named ____. I labeled every savings or cost figure with pricing-page retrieval dates or marked it illustrative. Signed ________ date ________.

Interview story to memorize

Craft a 60-second story: TechLearningPro needed AWS Cloud and DevOps system design interviews; you chose a design with explicit trade-offs; you proved it with tests; you governed cost with budgets and tags; you left an ADR so the next engineer does not reverse the decision blindly. Walk P2 in 60 seconds.

Self-assessment rubric

Area	Weight
Conceptual accuracy and service selection	20%
Working design/lab and reproducibility	25%
Security and least-privilege	20%
Reliability, observability, troubleshooting	20%
Documentation, ADR, cleanup	15%

Final synthesis before summary

Mastery of AWS Cloud and DevOps system design interviews at TechLearningPro is not logo recognition—it is owning failure modes, cost meters, identity boundaries, and the written decision that keeps TechLearningPro coherent under change.

Extended facilitation script (print for guild leads)

Open mocks with rubric visible. Stop inventing APIs immediately. Force a cost-drivers sentence. End with scores and one improvement drill for lesson 70.

Lesson Summary

System design interviews reward structured clarification, fit-for-NFR AWS architectures, security and ops realism, and honest cost talk—practiced with rubrics and TechLearningPro project evidence. Tag notes Project=tlp-lesson69.

Next: AWS Cloud and DevOps Practical Interview Preparation.

AWS Cloud and DevOps System Design Interviews

AWS Cloud and DevOps System Design Interviews

Lesson Overview

Learning Objectives

Prerequisites

Detailed Core Concepts

What interviewers evaluate

The TechLearningPro method (45-minute shape)

Scoring rubric (100 points)

Prompt bank (practice these)

Service selection heuristics (speak these aloud)

What not to do

Architecture and Design Diagrams

Technical Explanation

Running prompt P2 (worked sketch)

Running prompt P4 (worked sketch)

Handling curveballs

Using portfolio as proof

Peer mock protocol

Practical Implementation or Design Walkthrough

Problem

Steps

Enterprise Real-World Scenarios

Buzzword bingo

Silent single-AZ

Fake pricing

Security last

No delivery story

Best Practices

Common Mistakes and Anti-Patterns

Troubleshooting and Design Review

Interview Questions and Answers

Deep dive: One-minute architecture spine (memorize)

Deep dive: Interviewer nudge phrases

Hands-On Exercises

Exercise: Three timed system design scenarios with diagrams

Challenge ADR

Lab evidence checklist

Narrative: A candidate lost an otherwise strong loop by inventing a console-only API; rubric Communication and Architecture crashed—method plus docs discipline would have saved it

Continuity

Deep dive: ADR template (TechLearningPro)

Deep dive: Portfolio README skeleton

Deep dive: Budget and tagging

Extended enterprise scenario: acquisition pressure

Extended enterprise scenario: disputed decision

Extended practice scenario 1 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 2 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 3 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 4 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 5 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 6 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 7 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 8 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 9 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 10 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 11 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 12 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 13 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 14 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 15 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 16 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 17 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 18 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 19 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 20 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 21 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 22 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 23 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 24 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Extended practice scenario 25 — 69 aws cloud and devops system design interviews

Compliance evidence pack for auditors / platform leads

Glossary drill

Budget and cleanup sworn statement

Interview story to memorize

Self-assessment rubric

Final synthesis before summary

Extended facilitation script (print for guild leads)

Lesson Summary

Further Reading